Issue of legality of Rev

Issue of legality of Rev

Issue of legality of Rev


3rd.-New fourth wedding of Courtroom “Top and you may Anchor” A beneficial.O.F. had been renowned because of the a food during the Cousin. Franklin’s, Hall Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood filled new sofa, therefore try stated that the fresh new Legal up coming contained ninety participants.

The month of january

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. Roentgen. B. Norman, Burton, and you may J. Bayly ended up being chose the brand new members of the public Library Panel.

p. 207 Your body away from an excellent whale, that was taken on Winterton, had been exhibited on Church Basic.

The new Rev. W. D. Go, the fresh minister out-of St. Mary’s, Southtown, got, before you leave Southsea, become offered a wallet off ?61.

21st.-The new “Sisters” was actually in crash which have one of the stone piers away from the fresh Link, that it had more busted.

Feb. fourth.-An enthusiastic Anti-Tax fulfilling was kept within City Hall. The newest Gran presided, as well as the after the participated in what’s going on:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, Roentgen. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you will J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared as if the mover within this number.

Feb. twenty-first.-Good “Poor’s Rates” appointment got stored during the Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and a resolution protesting up against the 1s. 6d. every quarter rates try adopted. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and F. Starling spoke on the subject, given that conduct of the Guardians try defended because of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, among Panel.

Feb. 25th.-A situation and this thrilled considerable desire, was actually heard at State Legal, Tolhouse-hallway, before the Judge (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The fresh plaintiff is actually Mr. John Cobb, leather-based provider, having exactly who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin featured; new defendants were Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you may Grams. D. Palmer, have been illustrated from the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The fresh plaintiff reported that he had been a candidate with the work environment of Councillor towards age such as for example from the solicitation of Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and G. D. Palmer. At that time he became an applicant the guy extremely informed them he wouldn’t pay out regarding his very own pocket a great deal more than ?10 on expenses of one’s election, therefore is knew your Liberal class, that the guy belonged, would sign up the remainder. The night time till the election the guy obtained a price away from what the expenses had been likely to be, plus in results of that he at once watched each other Mr. Burroughs and Mr. G. D. Palmer. You to definitely imagine, he believed, amounted to help you regarding ?forty five, because memberships altogether amounted so you can however, ?42. Shortly after specific discussion it accessible to keep your harmless of one’s amount of the expense which could meet or exceed the sum of the signed up, and he and Mr. Burroughs next ran p. 208 towards Panel-area of your own Northern-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs said they had made agreements for their friend John Cobb successful the market industry-ward. The expenses of your election, he (the newest plaintiff) shed, amounted altogether to ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, therefore, that he now said in the defendants was ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-The newest plaintiff, within the get across-test of the Mr. Cufaude, acknowledge you to definitely ?39 of the entire number is actually to have – -.-Mr. Cufaude argued that in case, just like the plaintiff mentioned, new defendants got offered your a guarantee towards the excessive expenditures, brand new make sure should can be found in writing. And you will, of course the data was true, and that, yet not, he disputed, it was hopeless with the plaintiff to recoup, inasmuch as he themselves got invited you to definitely a large part away from the entire expenses are to own – -, which had been an unlawful act.-Mr. Chamberlin argued the plaintiff, after searching the newest guarantee in the defendants, acted merely on the latest trust of these vow, which for this reason, because they had inserted abreast of an involvement to invest the bucks, these were liable. The bucks, additionally, wasn’t invested by the plaintiff, but by the committee designated in order to perform new election, and you can through to the election was more, this new plaintiff wasn’t conscious that any of the currency had come spent into the – -.-Their Honour told you it absolutely was obvious brand new be sure should have already been in writing. He was from view, in addition to, that plaintiff wasn’t destined to afford the unlawful fees, and therefore he may not bring his step for money he said.-New plaintiff is actually, properly, non-ideal.

Comments are closed.